Fed Independence at a Crossroads: Lessons from the Past and Risks Ahead
Calisade Capital is an asset management firm that delivers institutional advisory services and weekly insights to the retail market via its Calisade Digests. Calisade focuses on creating alpha through robust macro, fundamental, technical, and sentiment research.
Introduction
This week’s Digest turns to one of the most pressing questions facing global markets: is the Federal Reserve’s independence being eroded? A string of developments has stirred concern. Governor Kugler’s resignation, Stephen Miran’s nomination, and speculation over Chair Powell’s future have raised doubts about whether monetary policy is drifting into the political arena. For investors, these shifts are not minor. History shows that when credibility is lost, markets eventually impose a costly reset.
Q1. What do people mean by Fed independence?
Fed independence means the central bank can set monetary policy without direct political control. The goal is to separate short-term political pressures, such as boosting growth ahead of elections, from the long-term mandate of price stability and financial stability. Credibility is the Fed’s most important asset—if markets trust the institution to resist interference, inflation expectations remain anchored and borrowing costs stay lower. The 1951 Treasury–Fed Accord was a turning point, reestablishing the Fed’s autonomy when inflation was running above 9% and credibility was slipping.
Q2. What are the recent developments that have led some to say Fed independence is under assault?
Speculation about the Fed Chair’s job security has created a sense of instability. The resignation of Governor Adriana Kugler at a sensitive moment left a gap in expertise, while the nomination of Stephen Miran drew scrutiny for his open alignment with political figures. Lisa Cook’s contested tenure has also raised questions about whether governors can be pressured out. Together, these events appear less like routine turnover and more like attempts to reshape the Fed. Markets are responding: since July, the 10-year–2-year Treasury spread has steepened by nearly 20 basis points, a sign that investors are demanding higher yields - potentially due to perceived risks around credibility and inflation.
Q3. What is the counterargument that the administration is presenting?
The administration argues that the Fed’s independence has already been compromised by its own expansion of responsibilities—from bank regulation to large-scale operations beyond monetary policy. The claim is that these activities dilute the Fed’s mission and justify reforms to restore focus. Proposals have included stripping the Fed of regulatory duties and confining it to core functions like monetary policy, liquidity provision, and economic monitoring.
Q4. Why does central bank independence matter? Why is this a focal point?
Without independence, monetary policy risks being used for short-term political gains, which historically has led to long-term instability. While looser policy may deliver temporary growth, the eventual cost is higher inflation, weaker currencies, and market volatility. For investors, this translates into higher risk premia across bonds, currencies, and credit markets. Independence provides the credibility that anchors expectations and keeps capital costs manageable.
Q5. Does American history have any moments when the Fed wasn’t presumed to be independent, and what did that mean for the economy and markets?
Yes. In 1965, President Johnson pressured Chair Bill Martin to keep credit loose, which allowed inflation to creep upward. In 1971–72, President Nixon’s pressure on Arthur Burns is the classic case: rates were cut despite inflationary pressures, fueling Nixon’s re-election but sending consumer prices above 10% by 1974. Paul Volcker’s stand in 1979 reversed this by pushing rates close to 20% to restore credibility, but at the cost of deep recessions and unemployment above 10%. The lesson is that credibility can be lost quickly but is only restored through painful adjustments.
Q6. Are there any other useful historical reference points from elsewhere in the world?
International examples highlight how fragile independence can be. In Turkey (2018–2023), direct political control of the central bank caused inflation to soar above 85% and the lira to lose over 80% of its value. In India (2018), a single resignation under political pressure caused the rupee to fall 2% in a day and bond yields to spike. By contrast, Brazil (2021–2023) shows the benefits of autonomy—formal independence allowed decisive tightening, bringing inflation down from over 10% to 4.6% and compressing credit risk spreads. The U.K. (2022) illustrates that even with independence intact, fiscal conflicts can still trigger crises, as seen in the gilt market.
Conclusion
Fed independence is more than a technical detail; it is the foundation of monetary credibility. While the outcome of the latest Fed pressure campaign are not yet decided, recent developments suggest a greater coupling between political administrations and the Fed could come to pass. Investors should not assume that Fed credibility is absolute - it has lost it in the past and can lose it again. Whatever the outcome, Americans with a long term view should advocate for a central bank that has the independence to make prudent decisions on monetary policy.
Interested in going deeper on the above topics? Our FREE Basic Digest provides 3-5 pages of summarized insights to keep you informed on key themes impacting the market.
Or consider leveling up to our paid Premium Digest. Typically running 15-20 pages long, the Premium Digest goes much deeper on a given theme, expanding on historical precedents and providing a bit of visibility into Calisade's institutional insider trading research.
Calisade's Elite Digest is our institutional grade offering, typically 25-35 pages chock full of charts, graphs, historical insights, and, perhaps most importantly, stock tickers that are directly impacted by these themes.
📩 Click to explore Basic, Premium, and Elite Access and see what top investors are reading.
